hypertension_evidence
MOVED, and it split in two, because it held two kinds of number. The OBSERVATIONAL records, a pressure predicting an outcome in people nobody randomised, are served by `prognostic_association`: call it with `exposure` as "clinic_bp" or "nighttime_ambulatory_bp" plus the `outcome` you would have passed here, in place of `measurement`. The RANDOMISED records are served by `treatment_effect`, with the same `arm` and `outcome` this tool took. THIS NAME ANSWERS NOTHING. It is kept so a caller holding it is told where the corpus went rather than getting an error that reads like the data is gone, and it is a refusal rather than an alias because an alias would answer: it would take the same arguments and return the same record, and leave a caller believing they had called a tool that still exists. It was also the only tool in this surface named for a disease rather than for an operation, which invited the reading that this is partly a hypertension world. It is not. The corpus is reached by the kind of number it holds, and the figures and every refusal are unchanged, including the one against combining a record from each list.
Use this form for new arguments. Follow concrete links for known values. Fetch-only readers may be unable to submit new URLs.
Exact input contract
{
"additionalProperties": false,
"properties": {},
"type": "object"
}