hospital_variance

Submitted arguments

{
  "measure_id": "PSI_90"
}

Native result and verdict

{
  "does_not_license": {
    "cannot_be_concluded": "a measure cut this estimator did not read, or a measure it does not carry, cannot support a statement that providers agree, that they differ, or that any rate is reliable enough to compare, and it is never a ranking of providers nor a verdict about any one of them, by any method, including arithmetic done by hand.",
    "reading": "UNKNOWN (rule coverage/no-denominator): `PSI_90` carries a published score on 130 of its 162 rows and a numeric denominator on none of them, so this tool refuses it. A composite has no denominator, which is what its denominator column says where a number would be, and a between-provider variance served without one cannot be handed to measure_reliability at all: that tool computes p(1-p)/n and there is no n here. CANNOT BE CONCLUDED: a reliability figure for `PSI_90`, from this corpus, by any method. What would settle it: the component measures and their own denominators, which this cut does not carry.. CANNOT BE CONCLUDED: a measure cut this estimator did not read, or a measure it does not carry, cannot support a statement that providers agree, that they differ, or that any rate is reliable enough to compare, and it is never a ranking of providers nor a verdict about any one of them, by any method, including arithmetic done by hand.\n\nNO READING IS ATTACHED. These fields carry no interpretation, and this world does not supply one unasked. To obtain a reading, and to find out whether what you are about to write is supported, call judgement_check with receipt \"r846\" and the claims you intend to make. A claim written without checking it is a claim this world did not license.\n\nThis answer declared no figure, so claim_check has nothing to decide an expression against and judgement_check is the check to use. The two are alternatives and neither falls back to the other."
  },
  "kind": "refused",
  "licence": {
    "coverage_database": "Contains information from the CMS Medicare Coverage Database.",
    "cpt": "CPT is copyright the American Medical Association. Served under a distribution licence.",
    "linkback": "https://hammer.ai/coverage-intelligence",
    "terms": "https://hammer.ai/terms"
  },
  "payload": {
    "cannot_be_concluded": "a measure cut this estimator did not read, or a measure it does not carry, cannot support a statement that providers agree, that they differ, or that any rate is reliable enough to compare, and it is never a ranking of providers nor a verdict about any one of them, by any method, including arithmetic done by hand.",
    "detail": "UNKNOWN (rule coverage/no-denominator): `PSI_90` carries a published score on 130 of its 162 rows and a numeric denominator on none of them, so this tool refuses it. A composite has no denominator, which is what its denominator column says where a number would be, and a between-provider variance served without one cannot be handed to measure_reliability at all: that tool computes p(1-p)/n and there is no n here. CANNOT BE CONCLUDED: a reliability figure for `PSI_90`, from this corpus, by any method. What would settle it: the component measures and their own denominators, which this cut does not carry.. CANNOT BE CONCLUDED: a measure cut this estimator did not read, or a measure it does not carry, cannot support a statement that providers agree, that they differ, or that any rate is reliable enough to compare, and it is never a ranking of providers nor a verdict about any one of them, by any method, including arithmetic done by hand.",
    "kind": "refusal",
    "receipt": "r846"
  },
  "receipt": "r846",
  "session": "49ec6090f32b112cd7fc2d39a72e0974",
  "tool": "hospital_variance",
  "world": {
    "build": 2,
    "description": "What payers publish that they pay, code by code, and what may be said with it.",
    "name": "hammer-coverage-intelligence",
    "vintage": "2026-10-01"
  }
}

Permanent saved result

Read this evidence receipt

claim_check

judgement_check